1. Feartamixg

    Feartamixg MDL Addicted

    May 15, 2016
    786
    631
    30
    v1.0.1620 ToolKitHelper is also very slow on my machine. Much slower than v1.0.1512 in Toolkit v9.2.
     
  2. MSMG

    MSMG MDL Developer

    Jul 15, 2011
    6,414
    15,627
    210
    In the previous version I had implemented a automated method to recognize and remove the language resource registry keys but there was drawback it also removed some of keys bit early and trigger the log to report reg key removal failure and so I had to revert back to old method of removing the language resource registry keys which has increased the code size.

    And the code protection I have added with compression takes time to load, will checkout for better setting so that the executable will run faster.

     
  3. 正义羊

    正义羊 MDL Senior Member

    Feb 21, 2016
    260
    160
    10
    #10563 正义羊, May 9, 2019
    Last edited: May 9, 2019
    @MSMG ,Actually in the regular integration tasks, the Metro Skin Integration Task for Windows Photo Viewer, Windows Media Player, and Win32Calc are work normal.
    Also, there is no running problem obviously with the components of the integrated skin.
    maybe you can delete version judge to test corresponding feture.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  4. Feartamixg

    Feartamixg MDL Addicted

    May 15, 2016
    786
    631
    30
    Since MSMG Toolkit won't support CUs and SSUs for some time, it means I won't need to build my image every month like I did previously. But I am experiencing ~30 second delays currently.
     
  5. intro

    intro MDL Member

    Apr 10, 2010
    239
    52
    10
    Msmg certainly does support it. Integrate the updates after you remove components.
     
  6. biatche

    biatche MDL Addicted

    Nov 14, 2009
    573
    144
    30
    Microsoft are the ones making things hard for everyone with their bloatware. In any case, being able to remove stuff than not is of highest priority i'd say. I'm just waiting for a working 1903 version... even if removal is minimal. Whatever works is better than not work.
     
  7. Ohan Melkonyan

    Ohan Melkonyan MDL Novice

    May 9, 2019
    3
    1
    0
    Wow, I never thought I would decide to switch to 10, this tool changed my mind :eek: Thanks for this great software, appreciate it
     
  8. Feartamixg

    Feartamixg MDL Addicted

    May 15, 2016
    786
    631
    30
    But doing so means SFC fails.
     
  9. intro

    intro MDL Member

    Apr 10, 2010
    239
    52
    10
    Sfc comes up clean even when you remove all components and then integrate all updates. This is on 17763.1 pro x64 en us
     
  10. Feartamixg

    Feartamixg MDL Addicted

    May 15, 2016
    786
    631
    30
  11. intro

    intro MDL Member

    Apr 10, 2010
    239
    52
    10
    There are a number of people here that have done it the way I do and the way MSMG recommends. No sfc errors on the 17763.1 pro or ltsc x64 en us. If you follow the right steps it should be fine.
    If you are installing to a virtual drive....well I don't trust that so I always install to a physical drive. I've tested it more than a few times and always the same result.
     
  12. AeonX

    AeonX MDL Addicted

    May 24, 2013
    798
    728
    30
    Not if you use 17763.1 build (not refreshed ISO, no updates) and remove components BEFORE integrating updates.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  13. intro

    intro MDL Member

    Apr 10, 2010
    239
    52
    10
    Exactly..if people did it in that order there would be less problems
     
  14. intro

    intro MDL Member

    Apr 10, 2010
    239
    52
    10



    you pointed me to a method that removes components after update integration, which isn't the right way
     
  15. Supern00b

    Supern00b MDL Addicted

    Dec 30, 2010
    768
    560
    30
    I made both LTSC x64 and x86, integrating updates first and then removing stuff.
    SFC comes up clean on both images.

    Don't say things are not possible when several people have done it successfully.

    Cheers.
     
  16. intro

    intro MDL Member

    Apr 10, 2010
    239
    52
    10
    #10576 intro, May 10, 2019
    Last edited: May 10, 2019

    Did you remove all windows apps, all system apps and all advanced components? If you did then I guess we know it works both ways. I'm going to do it in the order that MSMG recommends since he is the developer of this program :p. In all honesty whichever way you do it if it works that's the important thing.
     
  17. MSMG

    MSMG MDL Developer

    Jul 15, 2011
    6,414
    15,627
    210
    Ok will checkout.

     
  18. MSMG

    MSMG MDL Developer

    Jul 15, 2011
    6,414
    15,627
    210
    The SFC comes clean due to the automation added to WinSxS part to remove the sub key values be it 10.0.17763.1 or 10.0.17763.XXX.

    But there are other sub keys that needs to be removed and some removed sub keys needs to be retained if there are updates pre-integrated, which may cause future issues.


     
  19. intro

    intro MDL Member

    Apr 10, 2010
    239
    52
    10
    You can remove that now without any problems.
     
  20. Gunmicha

    Gunmicha MDL Novice

    Apr 24, 2015
    9
    3
    0
    Integrating updates first is certainly works when I tested it. The caveat is, you should do a cleanup image only after components removal. I've tested the ISO build this way few times on VirtualBox and one time on a real machine. SFC were all came clean, updates via WU working just fine and I didn't notice any errors.