Windows 10 is Malware

Maybe, but open source code is OPEN, so whatever attempts at government infiltration will be open for exposure, discussion, etc... Closed-source code is much more dangerous, always. You aren't describing a technical difference in security, but only a government's desire to "infiltrate" an open-sourced system. Sure they WANT to. The real question is how effective will they be.

 

Again, what's the point. First you denigrate open-source, and then you equivocate closed-source code. Your fundamental point is that there isn't any security anywhere, so you may as well roll over, gape your butt-cheeks and let Microsoft do whatever it wants.

And that's wrong. You know it's wrong. You aren't stupid, but you do have an agenda. You'd like to assert that you have something relevant to say, but what you say isn't really relevant. However it's effect is to encourage people into an aversion/aversion conflict and the resultant paralysis and inaction that occurs.

Which is consistent with Microsoft's agenda of infecting everyone's computers with their malware.

 

Lame and meaningless response to a lame and meaningless post, intended to distract attention from the topic and derail the thread into inane retards trying to "one-up" each other with their inane and retarded drivel.

I haven't the time, but someone should check to see if either of these members have every posted anything of substance, the entire time they've been here. If yes, then why would they crap in this particular thread, and if no then why are they on the forum at all?

 

Another thread has a chart that shows a comparison between Win7, Win8 and Win10, using benchmarks from several well-known softwares. Maybe someone could post the link.

The result are not nearly as conclusive as your post indicates. It's not dramatically better. In some areas it's better, in some areas it's the same, and in some areas it's worse. Looking at the chart from a very general perspective, I got the idea that they were all more or less equivalent, and that the difference in quality depended on what the User used the system for, and what their personal preferences are. In any case, none of the different Operating Systems seemed dramatically better in terms of performance, the differences were measurable, but not dramatic.

Given that, the lack of a dramatic difference in performance between Windows 10 and "everything else" means the only thing to talk about is the thing that IS dramatically different, which is the fact that it's malware.

But thanks for playing. Please do try again, I mean to derail attention away from the fact that Windows 10 is malware.

 

I made a point similar to this, and differentiated between scary, anonymous "hackers" and microsoft, and he makes a differentiation between "inside" being safe and "outside" being not safe, is false. Inside is also not safe, now that Windows 10 is malware. Essentially the two points are exactly the same.

And, with regard to the war against the fanbois that infest this forum, this is an intelligent and honest person. I endorse his/her character. Important, when there are so many stupid and dishonest people running around telling lies and trying to derail honest conversations with propaganda and bulls**t.

But also, I don't want to call them "fanbois" or "fanboys" anymore. I want to call them "enemy agents", and wonder if anyone else feels the same way.