Windows 10 SVF Repository

Discussion in 'Windows 10' started by Tito, Oct 1, 2014.

  1. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    24,590
    34,805
    390
    Yes, you can, as long as you don't use 17763.1 for upgrading, for upgrading it's better to use 17763.107 or 17763.316.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  2. AeonX

    AeonX MDL Addicted

    May 24, 2013
    538
    354
    30
    This is something I would like to know :g:
     
  3. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    24,590
    34,805
    390
    For UUP dump there is a workaround to set addupdates = 2 and it will add the updates online during windows install, because win 7 is not usable for servicing 10 wims.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  4. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    24,590
    34,805
    390
    SVF is not an update, it's for creating iso from source and svf file.

    I see you got the 5 bs posts to spam an online casino, reported.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  5. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    24,590
    34,805
    390
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  6. LostED

    LostED SVF Patch Lover

    Jul 30, 2009
    5,621
    14,370
    180
    https://forums.mydigitallife.net/posts/1554299
    Code:
    18362.30.190401-1528.19h1_release_svc_refresh_CLIENTENTERPRISEEVAL_OEMRET_x64FRE_en-us_to_en_windows_10_consumer_editions_version_1909_x64_dvd_be09950e.svf
    18362.30.190401-1528.19h1_release_svc_refresh_CLIENTENTERPRISEEVAL_OEMRET_x86FRE_en-us_to_en_windows_10_consumer_editions_version_1909_x86_dvd_10bde8bb.svf
    
    en_windows_10_consumer_editions_version_1903_x64_dvd_b980e68c_to_en_windows_10_consumer_editions_version_1909_x64_dvd_be09950e.svf
    en_windows_10_consumer_editions_version_1903_x86_dvd_b40c5211_to_en_windows_10_consumer_editions_version_1909_x86_dvd_10bde8bb.svf
    
     
  7. jim_p

    jim_p MDL Member

    Dec 11, 2013
    107
    25
    10
    Let me guess... new isos of 1909, just a few days later?
    Look what I am missing while I sleep for some hours! :p
     
  8. Yen

    Yen Admin
    Staff Member

    May 6, 2007
    11,810
    12,057
    340
    #3650 Yen, Oct 20, 2019
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2019
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  9. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    24,590
    34,805
    390
    @GezoeSloog Though i understand the route taken, but can foresee some questions;):)
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  10. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    24,590
    34,805
    390
    #3654 Enthousiast, Oct 22, 2019
    Last edited: Oct 22, 2019
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  11. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    24,590
    34,805
    390
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  12. vanelle

    vanelle MDL Expert

    Sep 22, 2014
    1,088
    875
    60
    images.jpg
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  13. patapout

    patapout MDL Novice

    Jun 23, 2014
    19
    3
    0
    #3659 patapout, Oct 23, 2019
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2019
    He work on it caus' the second iso was remove a minute ago :)

    [Edit] -> It work now , the 2 good isos is ok now :)
     
  14. qwesta

    qwesta MDL Member

    Jul 22, 2011
    141
    39
    10
    #3660 qwesta, Oct 23, 2019
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2019
    Also, having the problem to create en_gb ISO. Seems there is something wrong, although they normally work fine on each month
    /EDIT
    svf file doesn't work properly, it is not for en_gb, although it is labelled so