Windows 8 Beta

Discussion in 'Windows 8' started by Samlappy, Apr 29, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 3ricky114

    3ricky114 MDL Senior Member

    Apr 22, 2011
    436
    250
    10
    You mean: 7971.0.amd64fre.winmain.110324-1900
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  2. torko26

    torko26 MDL Senior Member

    May 28, 2009
    497
    1,095
    10
    am64 :roflmao: lol
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. Zack...

    Zack... MDL Member

    Jan 13, 2011
    106
    23
    10
    Since there are 2 betas this time, I really don't think beta 1 will be anything special. With 7 there was 1 beta so all the features just came on show. I think things will still be hidden in Windows 8 beta 1.

    They will probably show the new UI in September, but like Vista, the new UI won't be publicly available until beta 2. Usually when MS do 2 betas, the first one is mainly to test features, and beta 2 is for the UI/look and feel.

    I would say its pretty likely, as I have been saying for ages that:

    Beta 1 = 8100
    Beta 2 = 8200

    RTM builds are always rounded numbers; Windows 7 7274=7600. They bumped the build number. Just like Vista 58xx=6000
    It will probably be 8400-8500=8800

    Anyhow, seeing as though the development cycle is actually longer than Windows 7's, there will be waaay more changes coming up than before. It will be like a Longhorn without a feature creep. (Hopefully :p)
     
  4. GLYUKOZA

    GLYUKOZA MDL Novice

    Apr 4, 2011
    49
    12
    0
    What do you mean? This is also very Anonymus. Who else puts them on the archive? Sure to be leaked.
     
  5. mallo

    mallo MDL Junior Member

    Feb 3, 2011
    98
    14
    0
    if the beta comes to a close in September will be build number 8200...
     
  6. mike0206

    mike0206 MDL Novice

    Apr 23, 2011
    17
    1
    0
    thats ok. should be like that.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  7. mallo

    mallo MDL Junior Member

    Feb 3, 2011
    98
    14
    0
    is right. I see them that way ...
     
  8. Zukariji

    Zukariji MDL Member

    Mar 11, 2011
    209
    68
    10
    The kernel of Vista had nothing to do with the issues it had. It was that it took way too much space to install, ate memory like a fat evil psychiatrist, and the requirements were too high for 2007. Most laptops around the time were 1GB RAM or so, and as that's the minimum requirement for anything other than Home Basic, it ran extremely sluggishly. Today on my 2GB MacBook, Vista (SP2, admittedlt) runs fine. But the point I'm making is it had nothing to do with the kernel.
     
  9. Zukariji

    Zukariji MDL Member

    Mar 11, 2011
    209
    68
    10
  10. Yen

    Yen Admin
    Staff Member

    May 6, 2007
    13,081
    13,979
    340
    OK let's say we both have a reason why Vista had failed. :)


    The sign off of RTM was controversial (OEMs). I had tested it on a nforce II board AMD 3200+ with 1 GB RAM.
    It was very slow (hardware hungry), but the main reason why I have deinstalled was that I could not get a driver for the sound!!

    Later at some friends (who were stupid enough to buy that crap) for the 64 bit version they could not get any driver!!
    Terratec sound card, wifi, scanner. NO avail! Either they stay at XP 32 bit to use their hardware, or they throw it away and buy new one.

    Why Vista had failed 2007

    -Vista RTM has been released too early (not developed enough)
    -Vista is 'hardware-hungry' (your reason)
    -No OEM support, no drivers, especially at 64 bit (due to kernel update and hence new device driver management) (my main reason)
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  11. Zukariji

    Zukariji MDL Member

    Mar 11, 2011
    209
    68
    10
    #51 Zukariji, May 5, 2011
    Last edited: May 5, 2011
    Doesn't look like it to me. The "C" is fine, like other setup.exes.
     
  12. Zukariji

    Zukariji MDL Member

    Mar 11, 2011
    209
    68
    10
    But do you have any ending in :32?

    Bare in mind the user may be in a different time zone, which usually stuff like properties "last modified" changes the time to make up for the time zone difference.

    If not then fair enough.
     
  13. _spinner_

    _spinner_ MDL Addicted

    Apr 3, 2011
    680
    282
    30
    hi man

    how many set-ups can be for one build...wow...M$ doing a massive job :D
     
  14. meandmeme

    meandmeme MDL Senior Member

    Apr 15, 2011
    409
    155
    10
    4 setup.exe of 7971 =)) what site is giving this?
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  15. Jaycee13

    Jaycee13 MDL Senior Member

    Apr 18, 2011
    417
    197
    10
    :rolleyes:
    he has the 7971 build
     
  16. meandmeme

    meandmeme MDL Senior Member

    Apr 15, 2011
    409
    155
    10
    from where :?
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  17. ODY123

    ODY123 MDL Expert

    Apr 20, 2011
    1,164
    181
    60
    Yes, we want to get it too !!!
     
  18. BobSheep

    BobSheep MDL Guru

    Apr 19, 2010
    2,330
    1,377
    90
    Please post Beta questions in the Next Leak stickies as it appears the next leak will be a Beta. I will move relevant posts to the Next Leak thread later.

    I am closing this thread.