Download Windows Install Media Techbench/MSFT ISO/UUP/SVF/ESD + Office VL

Discussion in 'Windows 10' started by Enthousiast, Nov 25, 2016.

  1. elajitz

    elajitz MDL Novice

    Mar 22, 2014
    31
    3
    0
  2. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,647
    103,306
    450
  3. elajitz

    elajitz MDL Novice

    Mar 22, 2014
    31
    3
    0
    okay so i am on a fake 1909 version and not the legit on that was released yesterday?
    i don't have that kb4517245 installed cant see it in my update history

    i added watermark in regedit!
     
  4. elajitz

    elajitz MDL Novice

    Mar 22, 2014
    31
    3
    0
    Any one know how to solve this had tried reset store but nothing helps!

    upload_2019-11-17_23-52-57.png
     
  5. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,647
    103,306
    450
    This is a thread, specifically meant for Windows Install Media downloads.

    Might be better to ask this in the appropriate thread, 1809, 1903/9 or other build thread.
     
  6. pelist3rka

    pelist3rka MDL Novice

    Mar 21, 2014
    2
    0
    0
    How do I get Enterprise 1909 ISO now a days?
     
  7. Snuffy

    Snuffy MDL Expert

    Jan 7, 2008
    1,272
    630
    60
    You can also simply use DISM and convert Pro to Ent.
    convert the esd to wim, mount, convert, save then convert back to esd...
     
  8. Wannabe

    Wannabe MDL Junior Member

    Aug 1, 2007
    72
    58
    0
    Look in @GezoeSloog 's SVF Cloud Repo for Windows 10 Version 1607 build 14393.0
     
  9. fbcjhgfr

    fbcjhgfr MDL Novice

    Jun 29, 2018
    10
    2
    0
    thank you brother
     
  10. fbcjhgfr

    fbcjhgfr MDL Novice

    Jun 29, 2018
    10
    2
    0
    #1396 fbcjhgfr, Dec 2, 2019
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2019
  11. LostED

    LostED SVF Patch Lover

    Jul 30, 2009
    7,183
    21,302
    240
    #1397 LostED, Dec 2, 2019
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2019
    @fbcjhgfr

    source iso:
    Code:
    en_windows_10_multiple_editions_version_1607_updated_jul_2016_x64_dvd_9058187.iso
    en_windows_10_multiple_editions_version_1607_updated_jul_2016_x86_dvd_9053863.iso
    
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  12. bengalih

    bengalih MDL Junior Member

    Feb 12, 2012
    63
    12
    0
    #1398 bengalih, Dec 4, 2019
    Last edited: Dec 4, 2019
    Ok, I'm trying to obtain/create a clean copy of Windows 10 Enterprise 1909 VLSC (which can be activated against a KMS server). I've read through several methods and I've created several copies, but I'm not sure which of these methods is preferable or if any has even created what I want.

    I'm hoping someone who is an expert with the methods discussed in this thread can read through my process and point me in the right direction. I think you'll see I did my due diligence with investigating and implementing the methods, I'm just not entirely sure which is the best/right way to do this.


    Method 1
    I used was using the latest MediaCreationTool. I downloaded it from MS and ran the following:

    Code:
    MediaCreationTool1909.exe /Eula Accept /Retail /MediaArch x64 /MediaEdition Enterprise
    It created an ISO which has the following version inside:

    Code:
    C:\Users\bengalih\Desktop\1909>dism /Get-WimInfo /WimFile:y:\sources\install.esd /index:3
    
    Deployment Image Servicing and Management tool
    Version: 10.0.17134.1
    
    Details for image : y:\sources\install.esd
    
    Index : 3
    Name : Windows 10 Enterprise
    Description : Windows 10 Enterprise
    Size : 14,781,260,269 bytes
    WIM Bootable : No
    Architecture : x64
    Hal : <undefined>
    Version : 10.0.18362
    ServicePack Build : 418
    ServicePack Level : 0
    Edition : Enterprise
    Installation : Client
    ProductType : WinNT
    ProductSuite : Terminal Server
    System Root : WINDOWS
    Directories : 21509
    Files : 93935
    Created : 10/6/2019 - 9:18:55 PM
    Modified : 12/3/2019 - 11:21:32 PM
    Languages :
            en-US (Default)
    
    The operation completed successfully.
    This looks like a valid Enterprise image, but I was unsure if *all* Enterprise versions are considered VLSC? I was confused because I had to use the /Retail switch with the media creation tool and I'm not looking for "retail", I'm looking for "VLSC".

    Method 2
    Being unsure I looked for another method and found the SVF method and files repositories described here:
    https://forums.mydigitallife.net/threads/smartversion-tools-scripts.79415/
    https://forums.mydigitallife.net/th...ll-media-techbench-mvs-iso-uup-svf-esd.72165/

    I downloaded the following files:
    • en_windows_10_consumer_editions_version_1909_x64_dvd_be09950e.iso
    • [en-us] _en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_x64_dvd_ada535d0.svf

    I then ran the SVFtoSFX_370_x86 tool to conver the .svf to an .exe file and then applied that .exe file against the .iso. The resulting file was:
    • en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_x64_dvd_ada535d0.iso
    Looking inside that file I see:

    Code:
    C:\Users\bengalih\Desktop\1909>dism /Get-WimInfo /WimFile:y:\sources\install.wim /index:3
    
    Deployment Image Servicing and Management tool
    Version: 10.0.17134.1
    
    Details for image : y:\sources\install.wim
    
    Index : 3
    Name : Windows 10 Enterprise
    Description : Windows 10 Enterprise
    Size : 14,781,260,269 bytes
    WIM Bootable : No
    Architecture : x64
    Hal : <undefined>
    Version : 10.0.18362
    ServicePack Build : 418
    ServicePack Level : 0
    Edition : Enterprise
    Installation : Client
    ProductType : WinNT
    ProductSuite : Terminal Server
    System Root : WINDOWS
    Directories : 21509
    Files : 93935
    Created : 10/6/2019 - 9:18:55 PM
    Modified : 10/6/2019 - 9:35:51 PM
    Languages :
            en-US (Default)
    
    The operation completed successfully.
    This looks like the same valid Enterprise image, but I am still unsure exactly what *MVS* images are. I've seen some quotes on MDL that say MVS=VLSC, but are they really the same thing? What does MVS stand for?

    Method 3
    Lastly I used the ESD method described here:
    https://forums.mydigitallife.net/threads/windows-10-esd-repository.59082/page-77#post-1380516

    I downloaded the following:
    • 18363.418.191007-0143.19h2_release_svc_refresh_CLIENTBUSINESS_VOL_x64FRE_en-us.esd
    Then I converted it using decrypt.cmd to create a new ISO with the Enterprise WIM. The resulting image is as follows:

    Code:
    C:\Users\bengalih\Desktop\1909>dism /Get-WimInfo /WimFile:y:\sources\install.wim /index:1
    
    Deployment Image Servicing and Management tool
    Version: 10.0.17134.1
    
    Details for image : y:\sources\install.wim
    
    Index : 1
    Name : Windows 10 Enterprise
    Description : Windows 10 Enterprise
    Size : 14,781,260,269 bytes
    WIM Bootable : No
    Architecture : x64
    Hal : <undefined>
    Version : 10.0.18362
    ServicePack Build : 418
    ServicePack Level : 0
    Edition : Enterprise
    Installation : Client
    ProductType : WinNT
    ProductSuite : Terminal Server
    System Root : WINDOWS
    Directories : 21509
    Files : 93935
    Created : 10/6/2019 - 9:18:55 PM
    Modified : 10/6/2019 - 10:32:57 PM
    Languages :
            en-US (Default)
    
    The operation completed successfully.
    Again, this looks like the *same* valid Enterprise image:
    Version : 10.0.18362
    ServicePack Build : 418
    I'm confused here because the ESD file I downloaded stated it was 18363.418.

    So how can one tell what is actually in these images?

    From the best I can tell from the DISM commands these are all the same Enterprise installs.
    I can assume that at least one of them will be a proper VLSC/KMS install (again, is there any other type of Enterprise install)? But, I don't really understand the discrepancies between methods.
    Method 1 (MediaCreationTool) seemed the easiest to do, and if you can create it that way, I'm unsure why I should use the other methods?

    While I wait for an answer I might try to install each one in a VM and see if I can at least determine if they work and if I can spot a difference.

    TIA
     
  13. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,647
    103,306
    450
  14. bengalih

    bengalih MDL Junior Member

    Feb 12, 2012
    63
    12
    0