In that post he links to @abbodi1406's post, which is pretty clear: https://forums.mydigitallife.net/threads/windows-10-hotfix-repository.57050/page-383#post-1512822
Yes, true, but they way they said it I had no idea they were referring to needing the the first update for W10UI and it looked like they were only mentioning what the newest update is. The way it was worded is not very clear at all and the post he was quoting was cut off so I had no idea what the link was for. It was not clear at all what they were talking about other then saying the one update was wrong. I explained it in detail, then was chastised for explaining what they neglected to explain. English is my first language and I couldn't understand what they were talking about. This is the post they replied with. Dear abbodi1406 ...but KB4480056 is old, there is newer one KB4483452. Sincerely It really makes little sense.
@KedarWolf apologies, not sure what frame of mind I was in when replying to your initial post (possibly distracted) ... however regarding KB4480056 issue First noted here (by Enthousiast) https://forums.mydigitallife.net/threads/windows-10-hotfix-repository.57050/page-376#post-1506355 First explained here (by Abbodi1406) https://forums.mydigitallife.net/threads/windows-10-hotfix-repository.57050/page-376#post-1506432 With further clarification here (by ch100) https://forums.mydigitallife.net/threads/windows-10-hotfix-repository.57050/page-376#post-1506509 .... and here (by Abbodi1406) https://forums.mydigitallife.net/threads/windows-10-hotfix-repository.57050/page-377#post-1506524 starting with 2 posts later (than the above), the issue has been raised and answered on several (10 ) occasions, cluttereing up the thread. The point I was trying to make (and tried to make previously) is that members (at the very least) should search the thread for information before raising a question. The constant repetition of information in this thread (and others that i follow) is to say the least, tiresome.
17763.xxx LP's + FOD's by @mkuba50 https://forums.mydigitallife.net/th...-17763-1-107-pc-r.77945/page-184#post-1482799
Does Net Framework get updated to latest (4.8) automatically, via automatic updates, or do I need to download, install separately?
AV programs do a lot of system shenanigans. It would never be in MS's best interests to halt updates, especially containing security fixes, so that AV programs can "catch up"
Yes, winging it and letting systems crash in a way that makes MS look responsible is definitely a great business decision. If you are a MS fan you should show this buy supporting decisions that would make them better, not defending decisions that are rapidly creating a world were more and more publications are recommending against letting MS update your system.
MSFT didn't release 1903 to the public (the current mvs iso's were meant for developers), so there should be enough time for both parties, msft and the av's, to fix this before GA arrives.
They already do far more than any other OS does in terms of working with other devs to make sure things are ironed out before it hits the public. Anyway, sorry for the off topic. I'm a mild MS fanboy and I take issue when people unfairly characterize them.
I was talking about the updates freezing multiple version of windows. I work in software and we do replicate many consumer builds in virtualization for impact testing. MS has exponentially more resources than we do, you are being insanely lenient on them if you think these freezes are unsolvable mystery that no software company can solve.
I think the earliest right time to install it on versions lower than 1903 is only when a future .NET Cumulative Update will explicitly include 4.8 updates for those OSes.
I'd say after as their is no CU for .net 4.8 on v1809 yet, maybe next month's patch Tuesday. Though it's possible that MS may release a CU for the RP Ring before public release.